MSN recently released its latest search engine bing.com which could exclusively be called as code Kumo, which seems to be an alternative or a plain option for live search engine and competitive to google.com, the no.1 search engine in the entire world wide web.
It also provides some features that google won’t, obviously they would be unwanted or superficial view of the search results.
What actually makes it a mistake for being competitive to google!
In the content of search results, Bing is not consistently superior to Google. In many searches I did, the Google results were more relevant and useful. Not by miles, mind you, but in many cases Google delivered the goods just enough better than Bing to make me question the wisdom of adopting Bing as a replacement search engine. Just one example: Searching for “Best house paint for humid climates” gave me better advice links at the top of the search results with Google than with Bing.
When searching for product reviews, Google’s search result pages were mostly better than Bing’s.
its code kumo version
Its Beta version so I would better have an update to it..Update pending
anant01
June 11, 2009 at 5:51 pm |
yeah it sucks man, it took me 3minutes to get image results for ‘cool cars’ but on google it took me seconds…hell yeah it sucks!
June 12, 2009 at 6:36 am |
why they changed the name from kumo?
September 27, 2009 at 3:54 am |
this is a huge disappointment wat ever
October 10, 2009 at 6:41 pm |
quite impressive description sir, well done but bing is just a little better than other….sorry.